Just Asking.....

If climate change science is "settled" how can there be so many questions about whether global warming is really occurring at the rate projected by the climate change advocates' computers, whether global warming is really harmful to the planet or humans since CO2 is a natural gas that has been circulating throughout the history of Earth or why so many scientists with views that differ from the widely accepted global warming "groupthink" narrative have been barred from the public debate and/or dismissed as "crackpots" by global warming advocates and the major media?


The European Foundation recently listed 100 reasons why climate change is natural and not man-made as the scientists, world leaders, UN personnel and the many climate change-global government advocates gathered in Copenhagen, Denmark have been claiming with major news media support. The list is found at http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138 .


Among the reasons listed that should be capable of scientific documentation are:


* "A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years."


* "Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures."


* "Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms."


* "The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years."


* "Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years."


* "The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998." Sphere: Related Content